news aggregator

Heirs of prior owner of Matisse’s Portrait of Greta Moll claim rebuffed - The National Gallery is trumpetting this decision, but it seems more down to legal technicalities than any judgement of innocence or otherwise

Elginism - Wed, 2018-09-12 23:26

Legal action in restitution cases take many forms. One case that has interested me in the past is that of Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian Federation, et al. As I mentioned at the time, it had commonalities with a potential case I had heard presented relating to the same US court and the Parthenon Marbles.

When trying a case in a foreign court, there are many pitfalls to be aware of, not least the potential difficulties of enforcing any judgement. Another important aspect however in the US courts is that of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). I have heard reasons why both the above cases met (or would meet) the conditions set by the Act – but it is worth bearing in mind that other cases have not been so lucky.

This news story relates to the heirs of a painting by Matisse, which was given by the owners (in Berlin) to someone (in Switzerland) for safekeeping in the chaotic aftermath of World War Two. This presents an interesting case (from a British point of view), in that it neatly avoids the (necessarily specific, but thus rather blunt) definitions of the Nazi Era used the in UK’s Holocaust (Stolen Art) Restitution Bill. Of course, as this case was tried in a foreign jurisdiction, the aforementioned act would not apply in this case anyway.

The person in Switzerland entrusted with looking after the artwork then sold it and kept the proceeds. The painting eventually ended up in the UK’s National Gallery.

In this case, the Federal Appeals court in New York has rejected the claim, due to the fact that it does not meet the conditions of the FSIA, because the painting was taken by an individual rather than a state.

That said, this is a technical argument that means that the case can not proceed. It in no way endorses (or not) the due diligence by the National Gallery in checking the origins of a work by a well known artist (which has echoes of the Feldmann paintings about it). Possibly another case brought under a different jurisdiction might find differently. With the Feldmann Paintings, while the British Museum claimed that they were acquired in good faith, it now argued that it felt there was an overwhelming moral case for their return. Perhaps the National Gallery should follow suit?

Matisse’s Portrait of Greta Moll (1908)

From:
The Art Newspaper

Court rejects claim to Matisse owned by National Gallery
Rebuffing heirs, an appeals panel in New York says the court lacks jurisdiction
Nancy Kenney
11th September 2018 18:26 GMT

A federal appeals court in New York has rejected a claim to a 1908 Matisse painting owned by the National Gallery in London by three grandchildren of the muse portrayed in the work.

In demanding the work’s return, the heirs had argued that the painting, Portrait of Greta Moll, was illegally sold by a former art student to whom the painting had been entrusted for safekeeping in the aftermath of the Second World War. The portrait changed hands several times before it was acquired by the National Gallery in 1979.

In a unanimous ruling on Monday (10 September), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower-court decision that the National Gallery and Britain were immune from the jurisdiction of US courts because the lawsuit did not meet the conditions set by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. “The alleged taking of the painting was committed by a private actor” not “a sovereign”, the panel of judges said. “The National Gallery’s refusal to compensate appellants for that taking after the fact does not provide a basis for jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign and its instrumentality.” The appeals court therefore backed the district court’s decision to dismiss based on a “lack of subject matter jurisdiction”.

The painting was originally purchased from Matisse by Oskar Moll, the husband of Margarete Moll, also known as Greta, the woman portrayed in the painting, and taken to Germany. The couple were living in Berlin in 1946 when, fearing the upheaval of the postwar partition of the city, they decided to send the portrait abroad to protect it from looting.

Oskar Moll died in 1947, and Margarete Moll entrusted the painting to a former student of his who promised to take it to Switzerland for safekeeping. Upon arriving there, however, the onetime student sold it instead and kept the proceeds. Margarete Moll moved to Wales, and the painting then went through a series of owners, including the New York gallery Knoedler & Co and the Lefevre Gallery of London, before its purchase by the National Gallery in 1979.

According to court documents, the three grandchildren—Oliver Williams, Margarete Green and Iris Filmer—first pressed their case for the painting’s recovery in 2011, but the National Gallery declined to return it. In 2015, they sought a review by the Spoliation Advisory Panel, a British government body investigating Holocaust-era art claims, but the government said the panel lacked jurisdiction because the Nazi era ended in 1945, two years before the portrait was sold in Switzerland. The heirs then filed suit against the National Gallery and the UK in the US, and the US District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected their claim last year, leading to the appeal.

Asked if the grandchildren planned to further appeal the decision, David J. Rowland, the New York lawyer representing them, said: “That’s all being reviewed.” He declined to comment further.

The National Gallery welcomed the decision. In a statement, the museum emphasised that it bought the portrait “in good faith” and that the case “does not concern Nazi looted art”. It added that the Moll family had known of the painting’s whereabouts for decades before arguing for its return.

“We are proud to have Matisse’s superb ‘Portrait of Greta Moll’ on show to the public in Trafalgar Square,” said the National Gallery’s director, Gabriele Finaldi. “It is there for all to admire and enjoy.”

The post Heirs of prior owner of Matisse’s Portrait of Greta Moll claim rebuffed appeared first on Elginism.

Greece’s new Culture Minister - Welcome to Myrsini Zorba

Elginism - Mon, 2018-09-03 13:03

Greece has a new culture minister. Former MEP Myrsini Zorba replaces Lydia Koniordou in the role.

Hopefully in the coming months we will here more frmo here about how she plans to tackle the issue of the Parthenon Marbles.

Greek Culture Minister Myrsini Zorba

From:
Guardian

Greek PM seeks to claim centre ground with cabinet shake-up
Helena Smith in Athens
Wed 29 Aug 2018 08.24 BST

Alexis Tsipras brings in younger ministers to refresh government in run-up to crucial elections

The Greek prime minister, Alexis Tsipras, has attempted to revive his flagging government with an array of younger cabinet figures in preparation for a general election he has described as “the mother of all battles”.

Ahead of crucial polls in 2019, the once radical leftist has brought in 13 ministers, many in their 30s and 40s, in what has been hailed as a concerted shift to claim the centre ground. Six of the newcomers are women. Key posts, however, have been untouched, with the finance, foreign, defence and labour ministers remaining.

Speaking before the reshuffle, Tsipras told his Syriza party the changes were precipitated by the need for renewal as debt-burdened Greece entered a new era days after exiting the biggest economic bailout in global financial history.

“It will be the mother of all battles,” he said, firing the opening shot in what is expected to be a heated campaign; elections must beheld by autumn next year. “Our country, the government and the party need new blood and more appetite for work.”

Tsipras’ popularity, already dented by the implementation of the austerity measures he once vowed to overturn, took a further hit this summer after his government’s bungled handling of catastrophic wildfires outside Athens. The death toll climbed to 97 this week, with authorities announcing that 25 remained in hospital, five in intensive care.

The public outcry over a disaster now seen as one of the worst in living memory has exacerbated outrage over the government’s enforcement of budget and pension cuts in return for international rescue funds to avert the country’s euro ejection. Latest opinion polls show the main opposition New Democracy party leading by between five to 10 percentage points, more than three years after Syriza assumed office with the small rightwing Anel party.

The embattled leader’s effort to make up lost ground is now focused on broadening his government’s appeal. In an attempt to remould itself as a progressive force capable of claiming centrist votes, a former socialist minister, Mariliza Xenogiannakopoulou, replaced Olga Gerovasili as minister of administrative reform. Myrsini Zorba, a professor of cultural theory and erstwhile socialist MEP, became culture minister, while the former conservative MP-cum-independent, Katerina Papacosta, was elevated to the post of deputy minister at the key citizens protection ministry. Gerovasili, a senior Syriza cadre, took over this ministry’s helm, marking the first time that two women have overseen public order in Greece.

“He is not the Tsipras of 2015,” said the independent MP Haris Theocharis. “The radical rhetoric has gone and he is now clearly trying to establish Syriza as one of the two pillars in a two-party system. To do that he has to open up to the centre, but how successful he can be is another question.”

Signalling he had taken stock of the criticism the government has faced over the fires, Tsipras attempted to inject new life into his administration with leadership changes at the interior and justice ministries. In a nod to younger Greeks, who are expected to play a vital role in the elections, the 41-year-old deputy economy minister Alexis Charitsis took over the powerful interior ministry, replacing Panos Skourletis, Syriza’s new secretary general. Michalis Kalogirou, a 42-year-old lawyer, was made justice minister.

But the reshuffle was quick to elicit derision. Worn down by nearly nine years of austerity that has left 20% unemployed, more than a third of the population living below the poverty line and 500,000 of the brightest and best seeking jobs abroad, patience is thin on the ground.

Tsipras has defined the coming battle as a fight between the old and new with his own party facing off the “bankrupt and corrupt” forces that brought Greece to the brink of economic collapse. Instead of being revitalised by the reshuffle, criticism was widespread that the new government reeked of tried and tested faces. Yet even the Greek prime minister’s fiercest opponents concede that at a time of tumult and unprecedented political drama, he has proved to be the country’s wiliest politician.

The post Greece’s new Culture Minister appeared first on Elginism.

LBC interview - Arguing the case for the return of the Parthenon Marbles

Elginism - Mon, 2018-09-03 12:53

I was on Ian Payne’s show on LBC on 21st August, arguing the case for the return of the Parthenon Sculptures against Dominic Selwood, Someone that regular readers of this blog may have come across before.

What was interesting was that there was actually agreement between us on a number of points (although of course not on many others).

Unfortunately their archives are no longer free to access unless you listen on their app. Details here of how to do this on Android and iOS

LBC Logo

The post LBC interview appeared first on Elginism.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer